Both agencies enforce laws on equality among employees in the workplace. The EEOC investigates discrimination complaints against private businesses while the OFCCP investigates discrimination against federal contractors. The idea behind the merger is to reduce the budget for the OFCCP, bringing it down from $105 million to about $88 million, and keeping the budget for the EEOC the same.
The notion of a merger wasn’t all that well received. Camille Olson, testifying on behalf of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, stated that the chamber went on record opposing it. Olson said that “[b]oth the EEOC and OFCCP need reforms,” just not a merger. The person asking Olson the question was Mark Takano at a U.S. House of Representatives Education and the Workforce Committee hearing. Tanako also asked the NAACP director of Legal Defense, Todd Cox, who said he was opposing it and was “very concerned that the mission of both agencies would be undermined.” Cox stated that the EEOC responds to charges filed by employees, while the OFCCP conducts audits before there is a claim or allegation of wrongdoing. He said that the merger would hamper the EEOC’s systemic discrimination work and stretch the limited resources of the EEOC.
A major concern is that without an increase in resources, the EEOC absorbing the OFCCP would reduce civil rights enforcement. Labor Secretary, Alexander Acosta, tried to quell concerns by saying “[o]verall, there will be cost-savings by the merger. The budget shows that it actually doesn’t reduce enforcement.” The EEOC took on about 97,000 cases last year and has slated to take on 92,000 cases this year, with a backlog of over 70,000 claims.
This issue is complicated to say the least. For instance, the EEOC doesn’t enforce some affirmative action requirements under the OFCCP and congressional approval may be required to transfer authority between the agencies to enforce the other’s laws. We’ll keep you posted on this potentially major change in agency enforcement of employment laws.