This significant increase would essentially make an employee’s duties, functions, or tasks irrelevant if the employee’s salary falls below the new minimum salary level. As a result, entire categories of previously exempt employees who perform “bona fide executive, administrative, or professional capacity” duties would now qualify for…exemption based on salary alone…This is not what Congress intended.
In short, Judge Mazzant makes it clear that a rule change which eliminates the importance of the “duties” test is inconsistent with the intent of the FLSA’s overtime exemptions. The Department of Labor (“DOL”) could appeal Judge Mazzant’s decision, but most think this is unlikely.
The Department of Labor “DOL”) has recently issued a request for information (“RFI”) asking the public for input to help guide it in the creation of new overtime rules. Specifically, the DOL is seeking comment on several issues including, whether the current salary levels effectively identify exempt employees, whether a different salary level would more effectively identify exempt employees and whether changes to the duties test are necessary. Comments are due by September 25, 2017.
For now, employers do not have to make any changes. However, it is prudent to continue to review job descriptions to insure that exempt employees truly perform exempt duties. It is also advisable to take a critical look at salaries and make sure that they are commensurate with the job market in which the employer operates. If the threshold amount were to increase between $35,000 and $38,000 as some speculate it will, chances are slim that most exempt employees are not already earning salaries within this range. As always, if you have any questions regarding FLSA exemptions, please feel free to contact the Ancel Glink labor and employment group.